# EnglishWordErrorCorrection
**Repository Path**: mario1316/EnglishWordErrorCorrection
## Basic Information
- **Project Name**: EnglishWordErrorCorrection
- **Description**: No description available
- **Primary Language**: Unknown
- **License**: Not specified
- **Default Branch**: master
- **Homepage**: None
- **GVP Project**: No
## Statistics
- **Stars**: 0
- **Forks**: 0
- **Created**: 2020-12-29
- **Last Updated**: 2020-12-29
## Categories & Tags
**Categories**: Uncategorized
**Tags**: None
## README
# 英文单词纠错（English word error correction）
利用单词纠错算法和Python脚本，自动纠正word中的英语单词拼写错误
博客：https://blog.csdn.net/qq_39393772/article/details/106179763
## 错误文本
Find the spelling mistakes in this text
I started my schooling as the majority did in my area, at the local `primarry` school. I then went to the local `secondarry` school and `recieved` grades in English, Maths, `Phisics`, Biology, Geography, Art, Graphical `Comunication` and Philosophy of `Religeon`. I'll not bore you with the 'A' levels and above.
Notice the `ambigous` English qualification above. It was, in truth, a `cource` dedicated to reading "Lord of the flies" and other gems, and a weak `atempt` at getting us to `commprehend` them. `Luckilly` my middle-class upbringing gave me a head start as I was already `aquainted` with that sort of `langauge` these books used (and not just the Peter and Jane books) and had read `simillar` books before. I will never be able to put that `paticular` course down as much as I desire to because, for all its faults, it introduced me to Steinbeck, Malkovich and the wonders of Lenny, mice and pockets.
My education never included one iota of grammar. Lynn Truss points out in "Eats, shoots and leaves" that many people were excused from the `rigours` of learning English grammar during their schooling over the last 30 or so years because the majority or decision-makers decided one day that it might hinder imagination and `expresion` (so what, I ask, happened to all those `expresive` and imaginative people before the ruling?).
## 正确文本
Find the spelling mistakes in this text
I started my schooling as the majority did in my area , at the local `primary` school . I then went to the local `secondary` school and `received` grades in English , Maths , `Physics` , Biology , Geography , Art , Graphical `Communication` and Philosophy of `Religion` . I 'll not bore you with the 'A ' levels and above .
Notice the `ambiguous` English qualification above . It was , in truth , a `course` dedicated to reading "Lord of the flies" and other gems , and a weak `attempt` at getting us to `comprehend` them . `Luckily` my middle-class upbringing gave me a head start as I was already `acquainted` with that sort of `language` these books used ( and not just the Peter and Jane books ) and had read `similar` books before . I will never be able to put that `particular` course down as much as I desire to because , for all its faults , it introduced me to Steinbeck , Malkovich and the wonders of `Penny` , mice and pockets .
My education never included one iota of grammar . Lynn Truss points out in "Eats , shoots and leaves" that many people were excused from the `rigors` of learning English grammar during their schooling over the last 30 or so years because the majority or decision-makers decided one day that it might hinder imagination and `expression` ( so what , I ask , happened to all those `expressive` and imaginative people before the ruling ? ) .